Vijesti
Konacna potvrda da je stalna postavka o genocidu u Srebrenici nasla svoje mjesto u Kanadskom muzeju za ljudska prava.
Konacna potvrda da je stalna postavka o genocidu u Srebrenici nasla svoje mjesto u Kanadskom muzeju za ljudska prava.
Ja licno smatram da pored ove postavke u istom muzeju treba biti i postavka o genocidu u BiH. Zato sam poslao nadleznim subjektima Muzeja sljedecu informaciju:
Do not forget Genocide in B&H
The series of the Institute for Research of Genocide, Canada.
This series is based on scientifically verified knowledge and the essential results of scientific research, of the many eminent researcher institutions of genocide and other crimes against humanity and international law in Europe and the world.
The complete series of 16 episodes
http://instituteforgenocide.org/?p=4018
Sources of scientific knowledge:
From: James Kafieh
Sent: December-03-12 11:46 PM
To: remir
Subject: Ethnic Cleansing of CMHR
C A N A D I A N S F O R G E N O C I D E E D U C A T I O N
Dear Members,
The Canadian Museum for Human Rights (CMHR) has chosen to ethnically cleanse its museum by officially eliminating the narratives of all but five cases of genocide (see Article below). Canadians for Genocide Education (CGE) was given assurances at a meeting in Toronto, just earlier this year, that the CMHR was dedicated to being inclusive (if not equitable) and welcomed our submissions and case studies for inclusion. Now All fig leaves have been dropped. The museum has officially announced that it will feature the "Holocaust" in a special deluxe gallery. A second separate gallery at the museum will be dedicated to the five genocides recognized by the Canadian government. These include the The Armenian, Ukrainian, Rwandan, Bosnia-Herzegovina cases along with the Holocaust (Yes the Holocaust will get profile again in this second gallery). The genocide of the First Nations will not be acknowledged nor will any other case.
CGE stresses that it has no issue with the inclusion of these five case studies in the museum. However, CGE has for over 10 years held the position that the material presented in this museum should be inclusive and equitable in its treatment of human rights in general and genocide in particular. Genocide is neither new nor is it rare in human history. To focus on only the few genocides that the government of Canada sees as politically expedient to recognize adds insult to injury to the many other victims of other genocides. These other victims of genocide are today as much a part of Canada's fabric but unfortunately they lack sufficient political connections.
The present model for the CMHR is based on the concept that human rights are a commodity to be marketed to the highest bidder. It is clear that at the CMHR "esthetics" will matter more then "ethics". The CMHR's plan will promote a hierarchy of human suffering. As such the CMHR will teach Canadians more about racism than it will about Human rights.
For your information attached is a copy of the CMHR floor plan.
CGE will meet early in 2013 to discuss the CMHR and our options for a collective response. CGE will also be making final plans for this year's Genocide Memorial Week Event at that coming meeting. IN THE INTERIM I WELCOME YOUR COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS.
Yours sincerely,
James Kafieh
Tel: (416) 529-6041
jameskafieh@hotmail.com
Atrocities gallery 'too much'
Museum to revamp content; ex-workers disparage move
By: Bartley Kives, Winnipeg Free Press, 30 Nov 2012
The Canadian Museum for Human Rights is being criticized for its plan to focus on fewer atrocities and include more Canadian content when it opens in 2014. Against the wishes of former employees, Winnipeg's first national museum has done away with a plan to feature more than 80 genocides in an atrocities gallery in favour of focusing on five officially recognized by the federal government. The museum has expanded its Canadian content to ensure visitors are more aware of domestic human-rights success stories and failures.
Museum officials describe the changes to the content as the result of several years of engagement with the public and human rights experts. Disappointed former employees, however, accuse the museum of kowtowing to a board directive to ensure "positive Canadian stories" are given prominence in the $351-million institution, which will receive $22 million in annual federal operating funding.
The original plans for the museum's atrocities exhibit garnered negative feedback during the public-engagement process that deemed 80 serious incidents "too much" for a single gallery, communications director Angela Cassie said. "People said this gallery felt like a little shop of horrors," Cassie said Thursday. Planners don't want visitors to get so depressed they would be compelled to leave, added assistant communications manager Maureen Fitzhenry.
CMHR president and CEO Stuart Murray said curators could not properly represent more than 80 mass atrocities. "How could we possibly do them all justice?" he asked. Instead, the museum will focus on Ukraine's Holodomor, the Holocaust in Europe, the Armenian genocide, the Rwandan genocide and the Srebrenica massacre. The Canadian government has recognized all five 20th-century events as genocides, Murray said.
Notably absent from this list is the largest Asian genocide of the 20th century -- the slayings and starvation of at least two million Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge regime between 1975 and 1979. Murray said the CMHR may feature the Cambodian genocide at some point in the future, noting the museum's touchscreen displays allow for regular content updates.
"Because of the technology we employ, we're not beholden to fixed dioramas," he said, vowing to do a better job of explaining the museum's multi-layered approach to content. Another content change will be more Canadian stories throughout the museum's galleries. While the museum was always supposed to have Canadian content, its layout -- a series of galleries that spiral from the ground to the top – wound up placing the nation's stories at the end of the "journey," Cassie said. "We realized you were walking through three-quarters of the museum before you get Canadian content," she said. "We can't expect everyone will go through the entire museum... we needed to answer the question: Is this a Canadian museum for human rights?"
Departed museum staff, speaking on condition of anonymity, claim the institution's board issued a directive to feature more positive Canadian stories. Some complained of museum-board fears of upsetting the federal government or potential trade partners.
Murray denied the allegation, insisting the museum strives to maintain a balance between human rights success stories and failures. "If there are gritty stories to tell, they will be in the museum," he said, insisting there is no way to glamourize human rights. At the same time, the museum cannot be simply depressing, said Murray, noting one scholar told him, "I hope to hell this
is not a museum of human wrongs."
Cassie and Fitzhenry said disgruntled former museum staff may have different ideas about presentation due to their academic backgrounds. Actual museum-goers have different expectations from scholars, they said.
That concept is problematic, two University of Toronto professors suggested in a 2011 paper that makes direct reference to the Canadian Museum for Human Rights. If the museum presents human rights success stories about First Nations, for example, "its visitors might not consider
taking action to address current rights violations," museum studies Prof. Jennifer Carter and human rights law Prof. Jennifer Orange wrote in a paper presented to a British conference.
Orange and Carter questioned whether a state-funded museum can freely criticize government actions and policies. Canadian human rights failures such as the forced placement of First Nations students in residential schools, the internment of Japanese-Canadians and the ban on South Asian immigration will be featured prominently in the museum, Cassie said.
Murray said he is under no pressure from the federal government regarding the museum's content. The Harper government recently changed the mandate of Gatineau's Museum of Civilization to focus more on Canadian history.
Atrocities depicted in museum
Genocides to be featured in the 2014 inauguration of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights:
1. Armenian genocide (Ottoman Empire, 1914-1918): At least 600,000 Armenian residents of what is now Turkey were massacred or died in deportations during and after the First World War. The highest death-toll estimate is 1.8 million.
2. Holocaust (Nazi Europe, 1933-1945): Before and during the Second World War, Nazis exterminated six million European Jews and also killed at least five million others, mostly Poles, Roma, Soviet prisoners, the disabled and homosexuals.
3. Holodomor (Soviet Union, 1932-33): Artificial famine conditions created by the Soviet Union killed at least four million Ukrainians and millions more in other Soviet republics. The highest death-toll estimates approach 10 million.
4. Rwandan genocide (Rwanda, 1994): An estimated 800,000 Rwandans, mostly members of the Tutsi minority, were slaughtered during ethnic conflict between the Tutsi and the majority Hutu.
5. Srebrenica genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1995): Approximately 8,400 Bosnian Muslims were rounded up and killed by Bosnian Serb army and paramilitary members.
Not in the museum Most notable genocide excluded from the inauguration:
Cambodian genocide (1975-1979): At least 2.2 million Cambodians were executed or tortured to death by the Khmer Rouge government or died from disease or starvation due to forced relocations.
Vijesti: